About the library

Sources & Editorial Standards

Lorebloom pairs original library summaries with citations and keeps member contributions distinct from corrections explicitly reviewed by Lorebloom.

01 · Provenance

Sources and citations

Every current entry in Mind, Trades, and Work & Career has a citation. Each shelf card identifies the cited author or organization, year, title, and publication or standard. When an entry includes a source URL, the card also offers a “Read the primary source” link; not every citation has a clickable URL on the card.

Entries are Lorebloom original summaries. A citation points readers to the underlying work; it does not mean the cited author or publisher reviewed or endorsed Lorebloom’s summary.

02 · Corrections

Suggesting a correction

The correction proposal flow currently supports the Mind · Cognitive Biases shelf. To submit one, sign in to an account with a verified email and display name, then provide the correction text and 1–8 supporting citations. Each citation needs a title and an HTTP or HTTPS URL.

A new proposal stays pending and is not included in public feedback. An email-verified Lorebloom admin explicitly marks it VERIFIED or REJECTED. A verified correction appears publicly only when reviewer and review-time details are present; it is labeled “Lorebloom-reviewed correction” and shows a review date. Rejected proposals remain out of public feedback.

Suggest a correction on the Mind shelf

03 · Reader contributions

Member feedback and editorial review

On Mind, comments, rebuttals, and compliments from email-verified members publish as member feedback. The “Email-verified member” badge confirms that the account email was verified; it is not an editorial decision or an endorsement by Lorebloom.

A Lorebloom-reviewed correction is different: it is a correction proposal that an email-verified admin explicitly marked VERIFIED, and its public card includes the review date. A source citation, member feedback, and an editorially reviewed correction therefore communicate different things.

The current correction flow does not specify a review timeframe or send an outcome notice to the contributor.